usphs

usphs

1. The USPHS, UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Cancer Research Foundation of America supported this study.

USPHS、UCLA强森综合癌症中心与美国癌症研究基金会赞助这项试验。

2. After every six months, the clinical performance of the restorations evaluated by two calibrated examiners using modified USPHS criteria for inlays/onlays/crowns and modified CDA/Ryge criteria for veneers.

修复后每半年由两位医师按照改良USPHS标准和改良CDA/Ryge标准分别对嵌体/全冠和贴面进行检查和评价。

3. The restoration quality was evaluated using modified USPHS standard every six months.

并由两位医师每半年按照改良的USPHS标准对修复体进行评价。

4. Methods 234 teeth with cervical caries were divided into three groups and filled by the three materials and the one year follow up results were evaluated with USPHS evaluation criteria.

方法 2 34颗患牙分别用以上三种材料充填治疗 ,经 1年观察并参考USPHS临床直接评定标准评价各组疗效。

5. The 18 months follow-up results evaluated with modified USPHS evaluation criterion.

每组 5 4颗牙 ,临床观察 18个月后 ,用美国公共健康部制定的评定系统 (USPHS)进行疗效评估。

6. The long term results were evaluated by modified USPHS.

用改良USPHS标准进行临床评价。

7. Clinical assessments were made using USPHS criteria. Results:There was a trend of more failures with restoration inlay than conventional composites(17.4%,7.5%), but the difference was not significant.

结果:树脂嵌体的失败率显示出较树脂充填体要高(17.4%,7.5%),但二者之间差异无显著性。

8. United States Public Health Service, USPHS

美国公共卫生署